Universitair Belang
Universitair Belang represents the interests of all employees. Whether you are a PhD candidate, professor or receptionist, your interests are guaranteed to be represented. We stand for trust, open communication, transparent decision-making and less bureaucracy. Our goal? Less rigid rules and a more human touch. We would like to see more room for fundamental research and more appreciation for education. Moreover, we feel strongly that everyone should belong. After all, we are there for all employees and we aim for a university that appreciates diversity of opinion and talent.
What are Universitair Belang's focal points?
Trust is always at the forefront for Universitair Belang. We believe that in running the university and carrying out our work, we should rely more on the knowledge and experience of our scientists and professionals. All staff should have the means to carry out their work with as few rules as possible. In our opinion, this forms the basis for high-quality teaching, research and management.
To promote this, we focus on the following points:
- Professional and efficient support for teaching and research is in everyone's interest. However, harmonisation and standardisation must not come at the expense of scientists' and teachers' freedom in teaching and research. We oppose further bureaucratisation of the university: rigid rules resulting from digitalisation, harmonisation and centralisation. The human touch and the professional opinion of lecturers and researchers must prevail in considerations concerning teaching, research or student guidance.
- We envisage the university as an Academic Sanctuary, where a diversity of opinions is welcomed in an open scientific and research-based debate on technologically and socially important topics. The university should remain an academy rather than a hierarchical and tightly managed company.
- We aim to reduce workload by minimising work that does not directly contribute to teaching and research.
- We see a trend towards an increasing focus on interdisciplinary and socially desirable research, We are of the opinion that, in addition, sufficient room should remain for conducting fundamental and monodisciplinary research.
- Internationalisation requires nuance. In one field of science it enhances the quality of research and education, while in another field of science the Dutch context is essential. In both areas, the provision of information must be at a high level in both Dutch and English.
- We expect students to have academic interest and the drive to develop this. Too much rigidity hinders the development of scientific creativity.
- We contribute to building a university that has a univocal identity and communicates clearly with students and employees. Everyone should know what is expected of them. It is then clear to employees where there is room to develop in their jobs and to respond flexibly to current organisational issues.
- We envisage diverse teams, within which an open debate can always take place. In such a setting, safeguarding each other's wellbeing is important. Only then team members can speak up and work in academic freedom.
What distinguishes Universitair Belang from the other parties?
Universitair Belang is a representative reflection of university staff. Our top four therefore contains a proportionate number of academics and support staff, so that everyone's interests will be represented in the Universiteitsraad. This ensures that discussions, for example on workload, are conducted from a broad perspective. In the other staff parties, only scientists are in eligible positions.
What did we accomplish in the past two years?
Universitair Belang has worked on the following issues over the past two years:
- Removal of the smart cameras (person counters) in our Faculties during the Corona period. Using smart cameras in incompatible with our core value of managing by trust. We aim to limit control within the university as much as possible, because in our view this often clashes with (academic) freedom. We see the university as an Academy and not as a rigidly managed company. In our view, knowledge flourishes in freedom of thought and freedom of action.
- We have supported students in simplifying registration for exams. Students no longer have to reconfirm their participation in exams.
- We put the issue of workload explicitly on the administrative agenda. We demanded that the College van Bestuur provide insight into how workload will be relieved in the coming years. A workload relief fund was established by the CvB as a first step;
- Diversity and inclusiveness are important for a healthy organisation, but we are not in accordance with requesting more and more special personal data from our staff and students such as ethnicity, orientation, social class, etc. In the discussions with the CvB on diversity and inclusion, we therefore opposed the proposal to start requesting this data from staff and students.
- Climate is important to us, but we oppose abrupt conclusions based on emotions, such as immediately severing all ties with the fossil industry. We think we need to pool our knowledge and expertise, if we want to find intelligent and sustainable solutions. The fossil industry and its products currently form the basis of modern society and our prosperity. The transition to alternative products, from medicine to the plastic in our laptops and clothes, requires major investments in order to restructure society and to develop affordable alternatives. In our discussions with the CvB on severing ties with the fossil industry, we therefore added nuance to the discussion.
Sigrid Zuijderduin
With my legal background and great sense of justice, I value careful decision-making and transparency. Currently, I am committed to this as the official secretary of the Psychology Examination Board and to contributing to a fair teaching programme. However, I would like to also contribute to a fair university. That is the reason for my candidacy for the Universiteitsraad. In decision-making, I want to ensure that all relevant information and interests are identified and carefully weighed against each other, that voices from stakeholders are really listened to (`heard’), that a decision can be substantiated properly and in clear language and that it is communicated transparently. In this way I hope to contribute to greater trust and to make employees feel truly heard.
Agur Sevink
Agur Sevink (UD, FWN) is not only an supervisor, lecturer and scientist in computational research of biomaterials, but also a writer of fiction and a critical thinker. He was involved in the establishment of an AiO/PD organisation in the LIC and a columnist of the Mare for more than two years. In the Universiteitsraad, he wants to think along on issues that really matter, such as working conditions, the balance between primary and secondary processes, and services. How do we make the UL an (even) better employer?
Floske Spieksma
I am a full professor of Mathematics of Operations Research: it is better to model and analyse business processes from a fundamental perspective. This is why I have continued to work at the Mathematical Institute in Leiden. As a teacher, one notices how important and nice it is to teach with trust and respect for and from students and student assistants. Bureaucracy and rules are at odds with teaching students to develop as critical and independent citizens. These are desperately needed to meet the challenges of future times. Bureaucracy and rules also generate unnecessary workload. This applies within the entire academic community. Let's keep it `academic'!
Patrick Klaassen
I work in the administrative office as an information manager for the education domain. I have seen a lot of the university, both in support services and faculties. Through my position in the administrative office, I also got to know the administrative culture very well. During my career, I have been very committed to employee participation through the various service councils and, for the past two years, the UR. For many fundamental topics, coordination with the CvB takes place via the UR. It is therefore important to have a critical voice in the UR and to keep drawing the attention of the CvB to structural problems. This is the reason for my candidacy for the UR: it allows to use my knowledge and experience to actively contribute to creating a pleasant working environment.
Eric van Hoof
An organisation is not an island: it is a collaboration. From PhD to lecturer, from student to employee: we have to do it together. That is why I want to use my years of experience with Leiden University's processes and bodies to reduce bureaucracy and to work towards making processes less bureaucratic and more supportive - in the end, it's all about people.
Ronald Grootveld
I am Information Security Officer at the Executive Office. Before that, I have worked for over 10 years as a project manager and supervisor at the UFB Department. For me, everything starts with a good foundation: a good management culture and a socially safe and healthy working environment. I am convinced that in our `bolwerk of freedom' there is still plenty of room for improvement at all levels of the organisation. Having ambitions is good, but there should be no room for `collateral damage'. The university should be a safe and pleasant working environment for everyone. And it should be able to do so! Together, we will get this done. Discuss difficult things, express what you value, but also talk to each other when things don't work out and look for solutions based on cooperation.
Ludo Juurlink
Ludo obtained his PhD as a physical chemist in the US in 2000 and then worked at the Leiden Institute of Chemistry for 23 years. He combined teaching and research, started the Junior Science Lab, was a member of the LTA, received a Comenius Leadership scholarship to the university and was an UR member in 2022-2023. Since last September, he has been director of the Leiden Learning and Innovation Centre.
Gwen Wolters
Gwen Wolters, policy advisor for strategic communications, formerly at FSW now at SC&M. Be - Do - Say is what I like to work on: as we want to be, that is how we should organise ourselves and that is what we say. This gives confidence.
Contact
Questions and comments are always welcome from Sigrid Zuijderduin and Floske Spieksma.